Could it be harder to make the Commonwealth Games than to make the World Championships?

Cover photo of courtesy of Athletics Australia

With one selection criteria being entirely discretionary and referencing Commonwealth Top List performances, and the other cut-throat qualifying based largely on World Rankings, could it be that some athletes selected in the World Championships will miss a spot for the Commonwealth Games?

First things first: the Australian Commonwealth Games team is constrained to 68 able bodied athletes, due to a quota set by Commonwealth Games Australia. This will mean a much smaller team than the 107 selected for the Gold Coast in 2018 or the 99 selected for Glasgow in 2014.

Commonwealth Games selections are entirely discretionary for each country, without qualifying standards to meet. Athletics Australia has set a nominations policy that will see six development athletes selected, along with automatic nominations for athletes who had met the World Championships qualifying standard by the time they had won nationals.

On the other hand, the World Championships have a very objective, but highly convoluted, qualification pathway: meet a performance qualifying standard (the very objective part), or otherwise be the next best ranked athletes based on World Athletics Rankings (the convoluted bit). Australia can enter up to 3 athletes per event, without any limitation to the overall size of the team. At the last World Championships in 2019, Australia had a team of 60 athletes.

The selection criteria for the two events read differently, with one of many considerations for the Commonwealth Games being the Commonwealth Top List since 1 June 2021 (presumably on a three-per-nation basis). These are tedious to create from World Athletics Top Lists (which are based on a calendar year), but for some context we’ve created a summary of these for the women’s track events, on a three-per-nation basis.

Data presented on a three-per-nation basis, for the period 1 June 2021 to 10 June 2022.

There’s 42 individual events at the Commonwealth Games and four relays. With a maximum 68 athletes, that’s 1.6 athletes on average per individual event. To highlight some of the challenges with selection, that’s equivalent to selecting 16 athletes from the 10 events in the table above. Who do you pick? Who do you leave out? Want to pick a relay team including athletes not in individual events? Which places in other individual events do you sacrifice to do so?

Add to all of that the fact that there is less depth in more technical events in the Commonwealth compared to track events (particularly in the field), and there could be selections and priorities that could surprise. Think the women’s Heptathlon – Oceania Champion Tanielle Crase is ranked sixth in the Commonwealth in the Heptathlon on a three-per-nation basis – and an outside chance at a medal dependent on who lines up in Birmingham and how the event unfolds. She’s higher ranked than some athletes who have already been selected, like Catriona Bisset, who is 11th in her event, the 800m.

Pre the recent Oceania Championships, Australia had 66 athletes within a qualifying position for the World Championships, so roughly the same size as can be picked for the Commonwealth Games. We’ll update that list next week, but it will stay roughly the same, or increase slightly due to the hyper-inflation that Oceania Championships results bring to World Rankings.

In some events, there’s some noticeable differences between Top Lists and World Rankings, even within Australia. Consider the women’s 800m. Oceania Champion Tess Kirsopp-Cole is the second ranked Australian for World Championship selection (she was ranked 37th for a field of 48 prior to Oceania Championships, and now listed as 27th because World Athletics treats the Area Champion as having qualified. But even without that, she’ll have enough points to remain in the top 48 at the end of qualifying in 16 days time). However, she’s not ranked in the Top 5 Australians on the Commonwealth Top Lists (based on fastest times since 1 June last year), with the third ranked Australian (Imogen Barrett) being ranked 17th in the Commonwealth on a 3-per-nation basis. If you took Barrett out of consideration and put Kirsopp-Cole into the rankings, she’d sit around 21st in the Commonwealth.

With only 68 athletes being able to be selected for Commonwealth Games, does an athlete ranked 21st in their event in the Commonwealth get a spot? Or does Kirsopp-Cole get selected for the World Championships, but not for the Commonwealth Games?

The point of this discussion isn’t to single out Tess Kirsopp-Cole – she’s performed really well in her first season stepping up to the 800m – and in our view, deserves to wear the green & gold. The question is, at what championship(s)? And there’s countless other selection dilemmas that will be faced in the coming weeks for Athletics Australia’s selectors, and some interesting outcomes to be sure.

Who are your picks for the Commonwealth Games? Join the discussion on our Facebook page.

Latest posts:

• 
  Inside Track: Weekly Recap (7 August 2025): From Central Coast training to US Trials Fireworks
  From a home-based training plan by high jump star Nicola Olyslagers, to 16-year-old Cooper Lutkenhaus rewriting the record books over 800m, it’s been a week of bold moves and big performances. Add in the rekindled sprint rivalry between Noah Lyles and Kenny Bednarek, standout results from the US Trials, and the 30-year anniversary of Jonathan… Read more: Inside Track: Weekly Recap (7 August 2025): From Central Coast training to US Trials Fireworks
• 
  Inside Track: Weekly Recap (30 July 2025): From Moscow Memories to Tokyo Tests
  In this edition of Inside Track, we revisit the athlete-led fight that kept Australia in the 1980 Olympics, learn of Darren Clark’s rise, fall and redemption, unpack the financial fallout rocking Michael Johnson’s Grand Slam Track league, and look ahead to the World Championships with new eligibility rules making waves. Plus, a 16-year-old Japanese sprinter breaks… Read more: Inside Track: Weekly Recap (30 July 2025): From Moscow Memories to Tokyo Tests
• 
  Australia Strikes Gold at World University Games
  Australia’s track and field squad delivered a standout performance at the 2025 FISU World University Games, finishing atop the athletics medal table after a golden final day in Bochum, Germany. With five golds, two silvers and three bronzes across seven days of competition, it was the Australia’s most successful World University Games campaign, and a… Read more: Australia Strikes Gold at World University Games
• 
  Ed Marks streaks to victory at Lakeside10
  Ed Marks continued his exceptional road form with a dominant win at the 2025 Lakeside10, clocking 28:55 to take out the men’s title in a fast and deep field. Backing up recent strong performances, including a runaway win at the Victoria Cross Country titles in Ballarat and a slick 13:54 performance at the Lakeside5, Marks proved once again… Read more: Ed Marks streaks to victory at Lakeside10
• 
  Leanne Pompeani wins Harbour 10 amid Sydney Marathon preparations
  Leanne Pompeani added another win to her resume on Sunday, claiming victory in the women’s 10K at the 2025 Real Insurance Harbour 10, just five weeks out from her biggest challenge yet — the TCS Sydney Marathon, where she’ll line up in place of competing for Australia at the World Championships in Tokyo. Clocking 32:27, Pompeani led home… Read more: Leanne Pompeani wins Harbour 10 amid Sydney Marathon preparations